Skip to main content
· 11/2/2010

Shook v. Avaya, Inc.

Citations

  • 625 F.3d 69
  • 50 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1128
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 22681
  • 2010 WL 4292065

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • demonstrating detrimental reliance requires proof that the plaintiff took “some action as a result of the misrepresentation”
  • “We may affirm the order of the District Court on any grounds supported by the record.”
  • “In demonstrating sufficient reliance, the plaintiff must have 6 Case: 20-30059 Document: 00515913945 Page: 7 Date Filed: 06/24/2021 No. 20-30059 taken some action as a result of the misrepresentation; the mere expectation of a continued benefit is not enough.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scirica, Rendell, Fisher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.