Missouri Court of Appeals· 7/5/1913
Sholz v. Mills
Citations
- 176 Mo. App. 352
- 158 S.W. 696
- 1913 Mo. App. LEXIS 25
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- provision for appraisal' is technically, not an arbitration and not governed by rules applicable to arbitration
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Appraisers, Arbitrators, Chosen, Lease, Nortoni, Proceed, Reynolds, That, Under
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Norton v. GaleIllinois Supreme Court· 1880-06-16· cited 29×
- Goddard v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1889-02-11· cited 28×
- Garred v. Macey & DoniphanSupreme Court of Missouri· 1846-07-15· cited 14×
- Hyeronimus v. AllisonSupreme Court of Missouri· 1873-02-15· cited 9×
- Coffin v. German Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals· 1910-03-07· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.