Sholler v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no constitutional violation where court compelled display of teeth after witness testified on cross-examination that defendant spoke with a lisp and was missing a front tooth
• finding no constitutional violation where court compelled display of teeth after witness testified on cross-examination that defendant spoke with a lisp and was missing a front tooth
• no implied bias where juror was “very pro-law enforcement” and would give substantial credence to testimony of police officer but who did not indicate any bias against defendants
• no implied bias where juror was \very pro-law enforcement\ and would give substantial credence to testimony of police officer but who did not indicate any bias against defendants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).