Skip to main content
· 5/25/1995

Shoen v. Amerco, Inc.

Citations

  • 896 P.2d 469
  • 111 Nev. 735
  • 10 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1082
  • 1995 Nev. LEXIS 72

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there is an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in a lifetime employment contract
  • holding that an employment relationship allegedly terminated with fraud and malice may open employer to tort liability “beyond the bounds of ordinary liability for breach of contract”
  • explaining that NRS 50.070 \prohibits employers from terminating an employee who is summoned to serve as a witness in any proceeding\ (emphasis added)
  • recognizing \that the negligent infliction of emotional distress can be an element of the damage sustained by the negligent acts committed directly against the victim- plaintiff\
  • recognizing “that the negligent 7 infliction of emotional distress can be an element of the damage sustained by the negligent acts 8 committed directly against the victim-plaintiff”
  • stating that intentional infliction of emotional distress could arise from a tortious discharge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.