Shoemaker v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Applying section 4(l)(4)(17) of the act to the board’s findings of fact, we conclude that claimant’s employment was ‘performed for remuneration solely by way of commission. . . .’ Even if claimant was ‘employed’ within the meaning of section 4(u

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).