Shoemaker v. Takai

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that expert testimony of a land surveyor constituted substantial evidence to support the trial court's finding with respect to a boundary determination
• indicating that the latter issue was “closely related, in substance, to [the] question raised on appeal”
• “no cross appeal is necessary in order that an appellate court may review a question closely related, in substance, to a question raised by the appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).