Court of Appeals of Georgia· 6/19/2008
Shoemaker v. State
Citations
- 663 S.E.2d 423
- 292 Ga. App. 97
- 2008 Ga. App. LEXIS 709
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- officer reasonably believed that hard case in defendant’s pocket might contain a weapon after determining that defendant was nervous, jumpy, admittedly on drugs, and had entered a suspicious vehicle containing drug contraband
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ruffin, Andrews, Bernes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Mohamed v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2003-06-30· cited 23×
- Dawson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-01-06· cited 22×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-03-31· cited 21×
- Chapman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-05-04· cited 19×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-12-14· cited 12×
- Keller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-06-28· cited 11×
- Mason v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-05-30· cited 11×
- State v. FulghumCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-12-04· cited 9×
- Gentry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-07-27· cited 9×
- Satterfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-08-08· cited 9×
- McWhorter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-09-27· cited 7×
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-11-28· cited 4×
- Giang v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-05-22· cited 4×
- Vaughan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-05-18· cited 4×
- Castleberry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-08-09· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.