Skip to main content

Shoemaker v. Shoemaker

Citations

  • 25 Pa. Super. 183
  • 1904 Pa. Super. LEXIS 37

Syllabus

<p>Divorce — Evidence—A dultery.</p> <p>Where a wife, a respondent in divorce, appears by counsel, and submits herself to such evidence as may be presented, and the evidence is clear and uncontradicted that she kept the company of prostitutes, frequently visited with them bawdyhouses, and gave herself up to adulterous practices by remaining in bed with strange men, the court commits error in setting aside the report of a master recommending a decree in divorce.</p>

Judges: Beaveb, Hendebson, Mobbison, Oblady, Pobteb, Rice, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.