Skip to main content
· 4/15/1912

Shoemaker v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

Citations

  • 236 Pa. 120
  • 84 A. 763
  • 1912 Pa. LEXIS 722

Syllabus

<p>Negligence — Railroads — Master and servant — Oar inspection.</p> <p>1. In an action by a brakeman against his employer, a railroad company, to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from a defective brake, the case is for the jury and a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff will be sustained, where the evidence shows that the defect in the brake was not patent and obvious; that the last inspection was nearly two months before the accident; that the only force applied at the inspection was about fifty pounds, while the necessary strain to which the brake was subjected in ordinary use was three times that weight; and that the plaintiff at the time of the accident only applied force enough to take up the slack in the brake chain, a force not nearly as great as ordinarily applied in setting the brake.</p> <p>2. A railroad company cannot be relieved from positive duty to properly inspect a brake by showing a servant employed for this purpose failed in the performance of his duties. The fellow servant rule has no application to such a case.</p>

Judges: Brown, Elkin, Mestrbzat, Moschzisker, Potter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.