Shoemake v. McDonald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that motion for bill of costs was held in abeyance pending appeal
• denying costs for daily trial transcripts despite a plaintiff’s general statements that the transcripts “were used to examine and cross examine witnesses and earlier testimony was later read into the record.”
• “Although there is an underlying presumption favoring cost recovery for prevailing parties, a district court has broad discretion under Rule 54(d) to refuse to award fees.”
• rejecting argument that interpretation costs had no connection to trial
• rejecting argument that interpretation costs had no connection to trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).