Shoecraft v. Bloxham
Citations
- 124 U.S. 730
Syllabus
<p>A suit to enforce the performance of a contract is a suit to recover the contents of a chose in action, within the meaning of § 629 of the Revised Statutes.</p> <p>A deed of trust, in the nature of a mortgage, set out in full a contract between the mortgagor and certain parties for the conveyance of several parcels of land to him, and then conveyed to the mortgagee all the right, title, and interest which he, the mortgagor, had, or might thereafter acquire, “ in and to ” the lands embraced by the contract: Held, that the conveyance was in legal effect an assignment of the contract; and that the assignee could not maintain, a suit for the enforcement of this contract in the Circuit. Court of the United States, under § G29 of the Revised Statutes, if the assignor could not have maintained the suit in such Circuit Court if no assignment had been made.</p>
Judges: Field
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Realty Holding Co. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court· 1925-05-25· cited 78×
- Brown v. FletcherSupreme Court· 1915-01-05· cited 67×
- Kolze v. HoadleySupreme Court· 1906-01-02· cited 23×
- Plant Investment Co. v. Jacksonville, Tampa & Key West Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1894-03-05· cited 21×
- Shoecraft v. Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of the State of FloridaSupreme Court· 1888-02-20· cited 16×
- Gorman-Wright Co. v. WrightFourth Circuit· 1904-11-15· cited 10×
- Karp v. Twenty Three Thirty Ryer Corp.New York Supreme Court· 1945-07-23· cited 9×
- Brainerd, Shaler & Hall Quarry Co. v. BriceSupreme Court· 1919-06-02· cited 8×
- Commonwealth S. S. Co. v. American Shipbuilding Co.N.D. Ohio· 1912-01-20· cited 8×
- Oak Grove Const. Co. v. Jefferson CountySixth Circuit· 1915-02-02· cited 8×
- Power & Irrigation Co. of Clear Lake v. Capay Ditch Co.Ninth Circuit· 1915-10-04· cited 8×
- Ban v. Columbia Southern Ry. Co.Ninth Circuit· 1902-05-05· cited 7×
- Farr v. Hobe-Peters Land Co.Seventh Circuit· 1910-10-18· cited 7×
- Stotesbury v. HuberE.D. New York· 1916-09-16· cited 6×
- Jewett v. Bradford Sav. Bank & Trust Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont· 1891-04-07· cited 6×
- Jackson & Sharp Co. v. PearsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky· 1892-05-31· cited 5×
- Joseph Miele Const. Co. v. City of Niagara FallsW.D. New York· 1937-11-18· cited 3×
- Realty Holding Co. v. DonaldsonE.D. Michigan· 1923-12-12· cited 3×
- Hoadley v. DayU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois· 1904-07-01· cited 3×
- Ferrocarriles Del Este v. BowieFirst Circuit· 1943-07-02· cited 1×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.