Shoe Works v. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that injuries that were \only pecuniary losses and frustrated financial expectations that [were] not coupled with environmental considerations\ were \outside of NEPA's zone of interests\
• holding that injuries that were “only pecuniary losses and frustrated financial expectations that [were] not coupled with environmental considerations” were “outside of NEPA’s zone of interests”
• identifying federal action in a contract to supply federally generated power to an aluminum plant
• allegations that new transmission lines would cause broadcast interference “may be classified as economic”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).