Skip to main content

Shockley v. State

Citations

  • 297 Ga. 661
  • 777 S.E.2d 245
  • 2015 Ga. LEXIS 655

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding evidence was sufficient to support murder conviction where defendant was present for the shooting, fled the scene with co-indictee, and later fled the jurisdiction
  • explaining that Georgia courts have “often held that a jury is authorized to find a defendant guilty as a party to a crime from evidence of the defendant’s presence, companionship, and conduct before and after a crime”
  • even without direct evidence linking appellant to the shooting, circumstantial evidence viewed in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict was sufficient to support conviction for malice murder
  • deficient performance not established where lawyer failed to call defendant’s mother as an alibi witness because mother was ambiguous and uncertain about time frames and jury was unlikely to give her testimony much credit because of her relationship with the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.