Shockey v. Huhtamaki, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Court is not persuaded that an employer can avoid conditional certification so long as each facility is alleged to have violated the FLSA in varying increments.”
• “[T]he presence of a written policy is not evidence that the policy was enforced, and certainly does not negate the possibility of an unwritten policy or general practice to the contrary.”
• “The parties have not yet engaged in discovery on the merits of plaintiffs’ claim, and the Court is not in a position to rule on the merits of plaintiffs’ FLSA claim at this time.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).