Shobna Chandar Lata v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a petitioner must show error and substantial prejudice to prevail on a due process claim
• holding that applicant’s fear was undermined by two-year stay in Fiji after incidents of harm
• holding that a claim that an alien’s due process rights were violated requires a showing of “substantial prejudice”
• holding that to prevail on a due process challenge to deportation proceedings, a petitioner “must show error and substantial prejudice” (emphasis added)
• holding that claimant alleging a due process challenge in immigration proceeding must show error and prejudice, the latter “essentially a demonstration that the alleged violation affected the outcome of the proceedings”
• explaining that a valid due process claim in the removal context requires a showing of both “error and substantial prejudice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).