Sho-Me Motor Lodges v. JEHLE-SLAUSON CONST.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing the appeal of a purported appellant who was not a party aggrieved by a judgment it attempted to appeal
• trial court's order was final judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) where the court found there was \`no just reason for delay in the entry of said final judgment'\ even though the court did not expressly \direct\ the entry of final judgment
• “Implicit within this requirement, however, is the knowledge that one has a claim against the opposing party. Certainly Rule 13(a) cannot be construed to require a party to file as a compulsory counterclaim a claim which it does not know it has.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).