Shmael Turkhan v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• following Chow, and noting other avenues of habeas review were still available and therefore INA § 106(a)(10) is unlike other “true door-closing statutes – [where] the constitutional claims . . . would be reviewed either pursuant to the statutes at issue or not at all”
• following Chow, and noting other avenues of habeas review were still available and therefore INA § 106(a)(10) is unlike other “true door-closing statutes – [where] the constitutional claims . . . would be reviewed either pursuant to the statutes at issue or not at all”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).