Shkambi v. U.S. Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming an adverse credibility finding where the asylum applicant described only one incident of harm during his credible-fear interview but described three such incidents during asylum proceedings
• relying in part on the omission of “entire in- cidents and other significant facts both during his airport interview and again at his credible-fear interview” to sustain an adverse cred- ibility finding
• “Although Shkambi offered his fear as an explanation for these omissions and inconsistencies, that explanation does not compel a conclusion that Shkambi was credible.”
• “Although Shkambi offered his fear as an explanation for these omissions and inconsistencies, that explanation does not compel a conclusion that Shkambi was credible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).