Shiver v. Norfolk-Southern Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing the denial of plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint to add a closely related party
• fact that the original and added defendant were “so closely intertwined also negates the existence of any prejudice” to the added defendant
• same registered agent received service for both original and added defendant, and same lawyer represented both entities throughout the litigation
• in FELA case, amendment which changed defendant employer arose out of same occurrence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).