Shiver v. Barrow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Court of Federal Claims lacked jurisdiction to entertain claim of unjust conviction and imprisonment, absent a valid cer-tifícate of innocence
• noting the district court's \broad discretion in deciding whether or not to issue\ a certificate of innocence
• noting the district court’s “broad discretion in deciding whether or not to issue” a certifícate of innocence
• citing, e.g., Sanders v. United States, 252 F.3d 1329, 1333 (Fed.Cir.2001)
• citing, e.g., Sanders v. United States, 252 F.3d 1329, 1333 (Fed.Cir.2001)
• “This Court has no authority to re-examine in detail the facts surrounding a conviction or imprisonment . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).