Supreme Court of Alabama· 4/2/2004

Shiv-Ram, Inc. v. McCaleb

Citations

892 So. 2d 299
2003 WL 23025586

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that, under Gore and Campbell , a damages ratio of \slightly less than three to one\ was not unreasonable
holding that, under Gore and Campbell , a damages ratio of \slightly less than three to one\ was not unreasonable
defendant's concession that it was insured, coupled with the absence of \evidence that payment of the damages awarded [would] cause it any undue financial hardship.... weigh[ed] against a finding of excessiveness\
defendant's concession that it was insured, coupled with the absence of \evidence that payment of the damages awarded [would] cause it any undue financial hardship. . . . weigh[ed] against a finding of excessiveness\
discussing the Green Oil factors
discussing the Green Oil factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harwood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.