Shirlon Auer v. Kamy Real Property Trust

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that party’s “failure to file his notice of appeal in accordance with the statute therefore deprived the Court of Appeals of jurisdiction”
• holding that statutory time limits for taking an appeal are jurisdictional based on their “longstanding treatment” as such by the Supreme Court
• holding that the statutory time for the taking of an appeal from a district court decision is jurisdictional
• holding that the statutory time for the taking of an appeal from a district court decision is jurisdictional
• holding that time limit in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a) for filing appeals in civil case is jurisdictional
• holding that time limit in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a) for filing appeals in civil case is jurisdictional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).