Shirlington Limousine & Transportation, Inc. v. San Diego Union-Tribune

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “‘self-inflicted’ harm caused by the voter . . . does not amount to an infringement of the franchise right”
• noting that “the research, writing, and publication [of the defamatory articles] took place entirely within San Diego” and that the D.C. bureau provided “no assistance . . . in preparing the[] articles”
• finding the court did not have personal jurisdiction over California newspaper whose only persistent course of conduct in the District of Columbia was a news bureau engaged in no functions aside from newsgathering
• “The newsgathering exception has been expressly applied to Section 13–423 in subsequent cases.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).