Shirley Norman v. Arkansas Department of Education, Ann Poteet, and Paul Leuhr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “any motion that draws into question the correctness of the judgment is functionally a motion under [Rule 59(e)], whatever its label” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• explaining relief under Rule 59(e) is “generally available only when a manifest error affects the correctness of the judgment” (internal quotation omitted)
• explaining relief under Rule 59(e) is “generally available only when a manifest error affects the correctness of the judgment” (internal quotation omitted)
• reserving dismissal with prejudice for matters where “the plaintiff has intentionally delayed the action”
• any motion questioning the correctness of a judgment is functionally a Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion, regardless of how the motion is styled
• any motion questioning the correctness of a judgment is functionally a Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion, regardless of how the motion is styled

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).