SHIRLEY A. JACKSON v. CHAVVIS CAMPBELL

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting district court’s conclusion that the Secretary had failed to justify new policy direction that conflicted with previous, longstanding administrative interpretation
• \Congress has not addressed specifically the question of the scope of the abortion prohibition. The language of the statute and the legislative history can support either of the litigants' positions\
• “Congress has not addressed specifically the question of the scope of the abortion prohibition. The language of the statute and the legislative history can support either of the litigants’ positions”
• agency’s contemporaneous ] construction of statute should be given deference because it is more likely to reflect intent of enacting Congress

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).