Skip to main content
· 9/12/2006

Shirdena M. Twymon v. Wells Fargo & Company, Doing Business as Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.

Citations

  • 462 F.3d 925
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 23180
  • 88 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,523
  • 105 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 465
  • 2006 WL 2595961

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that while we review summary judgment “mak[ing] all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party,” we must do so “without resort to speculation”
  • noting that racially offensive statements that are isolated and unrelated to the decision-making process are not direct evidence of discrimination
  • “Contrasting the treatment of similarly situated employees outside of the protected class with the employee’s treatment is one way to point towards a race-based motivation”
  • stating this prima facie case for retaliation claims under both Title VII and the ICRA
  • affirming a district court cannot extrapolate racial animus from statements like “you don’t know your place”
  • phrasing the second element as requiring Plaintiff to show he was “meeting the employer’s legitimate job ex pectations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Melloy, Colloton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.