Shird v. MISSISSIPPI STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[t]he Court of Appeals erred in not reversing and remanding this case to the EAB with directions to declare two vacancies at the Psychologist I position . . . so that Cummins and Shird may properly be considered for the positions under the rules of the State Personnel Board”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).