Shipping Corp. of India Ltd. v. Jaldhi Overseas PTE Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a midstream EFT was not the “property” of judgment debt- or
• reviewing de novo the “threshold 16 issue of whether EFTs are indeed ‘defendant’s’ property”
• “EFTs are neither the property of the originator nor the beneficiary while briefly in the possession of an intermediary bank.”
• under statute that allows attachment of “the defendant’s tangible or intangible personal property,” only property that is “the ‘defendant’s’ ” is attachable
• “For maritime attachments under Rule B . . . the question of ownership is critical”
• “[A] panel of our Court is bound by the decisions of prior panels until such time as they are overruled either by an en banc panel of our Court or by the Supreme Court.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).