Shipp v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that intent to burglarize was established even if defendant was acting under mistake of fact regarding object of his offense
• holding that intent to burglarize is established even if defendant was mistaken about object of offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Robles v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-02-15· cited 125×
• Goss v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-03-04· cited 113×
• Corpus v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-08-31· cited 95×
• Wyatt v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-05-10· cited 73×
• Juhasz v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1992-06-24· cited 46×
• Nevarez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-01-16· cited 31×
• Ramos v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1991-12-19· cited 28×
• Tatum v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-03-30· cited 11×
• Hosey v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1988-11-03· cited 5×
• Bonier v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1987-09-03· cited 3×
• Wayne L. Page v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1994-11-23
• Thomas Reyes v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1995-02-08
• Bakari D. Holland v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-01-06
• James Jordan v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2015-11-05

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Burks v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1968-10-30· cited 31×