Shipp v. Shipp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding a provision of a judgment was ambiguous and reversing \because of the uncertainty of the intent\ of that provision
• reversing a divorce judgment because a provision within the judgment was ambiguous and uncertain
• \we find no indication that any request was ever made to the trial court for post-judgment amendment or clarification under Rule 59\ (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Arnold v. Arnold
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2007-07-13· cited 14×
• ALA. DEPT. OF MENTAL HEALTH v. Marshall
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1999-09-10· cited 7×
• Chapman v. Chapman
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2016-08-19· cited 1×
• Kendra Satterwhite Smith v. Anthony Thomas Smith
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2025-09-05

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Hicks v. Hicks
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1974-06-12· cited 11×