District Court of Appeal of Florida· 8/4/2015
Shipman v. State
Citations
- 171 So. 3d 199
- 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11652
- 2015 WL 4622782
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[B]ecause [a] double jeopardy violation constitutes fundamental error, it may be addressed for the first time in a direct appeal.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ray, Thomas, Wetherell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- Binns v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-04-23· cited 24×
- Tannihill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-02· cited 18×
- Hunt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-10-04· cited 13×
- Hill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-10· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.