Shipley v. State of Oklahoma

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating that allegations of state law procedural errors generally are not cognizable on federal habeas review
• finding petitioner’s claim that the state trial court failed “to provide adequate conclusions of law in its order denying ... post-conviction relief’ did “not amount to a federal constitutional claim that is cognizable in ... a federal habeas action”
• finding petitioner’s claim that the state trial court failed “to provide adequate conclusions of law in its order denying . . . post-conviction relief” did “not amount to a federal constitutional claim that is cognizable 8 in . . . a federal habeas action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).