Shipe v. Public Wholesale Water Supply District No. 25

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that while appellants had 12 standing, the issue was nonetheless not ripe for adjudication
• applying unlimited standard of review to determine whether district court lacked jurisdiction to render decision because plaintiffs lacked standing and issues they presented were not ripe for adjudication
• applying unlimited standard of review to determine whether district court lacked jurisdiction to render decision because plaintiffs lacked standing and issues they presented were not ripe for adjudication
• applying unlimited standard of review to determine whether district court lacked jurisdiction to render decision because plaintiffs lacked standing and issues they presented were not ripe for adjudication
• Kansas courts do not consider issues unless the issues are ripe, meaning they have \taken fixed and final shape rather than remaining nebulous and contingent\
• Kansas courts do not consider issues unless the issues are ripe, meaning issues have \taken fixed and final shape rather than remaining nebulous and contingent.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).