Skip to main content
· 3/3/1989

Shipbuilders Council of America v. United States of America

Citations

  • 868 F.2d 452
  • 276 U.S. App. D.C. 123
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2539
  • 1989 WL 17030

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiff lacked standing to challenge a Jones Act ruling letter regarding a third party based on “highly general” “hypothesizing” about competitive harm
  • “The denial of . . . a [section 553(e)] petition is subject to judicial review, provided that the petitioner can establish the requisite article III standing.”
  • “[W]e know of no authority recognizing that the mere potential precedential effect of an agency action affords a bystander to that action a basis for complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Silberman, Buckley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.