Skip to main content
· 3/6/1884

Shinn v. Cummins

Citations

  • 65 Cal. 97
  • 3 P. 133
  • 1884 Cal. LEXIS 457

Syllabus

<p>Summons—Practice—Indorsement op Attorney’s Name.—A failure to indorse the name of the plaintiff’s attorney upon the hack of a summons will not invalidate it when the name is written upon the face of the writ.</p> <p>Id.—Motion to Dismiss__The pendency of a motion “to dismiss, vacate, and set aside the pretended service of summons and copy of complaint,” does not extend the time specified in the summons for answering.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • separate findings on each issue are helpful for review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharpstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.