Shingle v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the crimes of rape of a child and incest had different criminal intents because the intent to have sex with a child is different than the intent to have sex with someone related to you
• court examined rape of a child in the third degree statute and incest statute to reject argument that the \two crimes involve separate intent\ because \[t]he intent to have sex with someone related to you differs from the intent to have sex with a child\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).