· 4/18/2002
Shilo Inn Portland/205, LLC v. Multnomah County
Citations
- 45 P.3d 107
- 334 Or. 11
- 2002 Ore. LEXIS 236
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing that method of analysis
- when interpreting referred constitutional provision, court's task is to discern intent of voters; best evidence of voters' intent is text of provision
- when interpreting referred constitutional provision, court’s task is to discern intent of voters; best evidence of voters’ intent is text of provision
- if doubt remains as to meaning of initiated or referred constitutional provision, “the court will consider the history * * * in an effort to resolve the matter”
- “The fact that the legislature that proposed Measure 50 to the people and enacted its implementing leg- islation might have held a different view does not inform our analysis of Measure 5 and, therefore, cannot dictate deriv- atively how we interpret Measure 50.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carson, Gillette, Durham, Leeson, Riggs, Balmer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.