Skip to main content
· 4/18/2002

Shilo Inn Portland/205, LLC v. Multnomah County

Citations

  • 45 P.3d 107
  • 334 Or. 11
  • 2002 Ore. LEXIS 236

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing that method of analysis
  • when interpreting referred constitutional provision, court's task is to discern intent of voters; best evidence of voters' intent is text of provision
  • when interpreting referred constitutional provision, court’s task is to discern intent of voters; best evidence of voters’ intent is text of provision
  • if doubt remains as to meaning of initiated or referred constitutional provision, “the court will consider the history * * * in an effort to resolve the matter”
  • “The fact that the legislature that proposed Measure 50 to the people and enacted its implementing leg- islation might have held a different view does not inform our analysis of Measure 5 and, therefore, cannot dictate deriv- atively how we interpret Measure 50.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Durham, Leeson, Riggs, Balmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.