Shikoku Chemicals Corp. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff's reliance interest was sufficient to preclude Commerce from changing its methodology during the fifth and sixth reviews of the relevant ADD order
• finding that principles of fairness can prevent Commerce from changing its methodology without adequate notice
• finding that principles of fairness can prevent Commerce from changing its methodology without adequate notice
• holding that it was unreasonable for Commerce to alter a methodology used in the original less than fair value investigation and four annual administrative reviews, where the fact pattern remained unchanged and the error discovered in the methodology was of little significance
• finding that it was unreasonable for Commerce to alter a methodology that had been consistently used in the investigation and four previous administrative reviews, where the fact pattern remained unchanged and the error discovered in the methodology was of little significance
• overturning Commerce’s use of a slightly improved methodology when the respondent demonstrated that it had set its prices in reliance on the old methodology

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).