Skip to main content
· 6/14/1894

Shiflet v. Dowell

Citations

  • 90 Va. 745
  • 19 S.E. 848
  • 1894 Va. LEXIS 57

Syllabus

<p>1. Ejectment — Verdict—Alteration.—In action of ejectment jury found verdict for plaintiff for all the land claimed in his declaration. Judgment was entered thereon and the jury discharged. Defendant moved for a new trial. The court entered an order declaring it would grant a new trial unless plaintiff abated the verdict and took judgment for part of the land. Plaintiff abated as required : Held : The court had no power to make the order.</p> <p>2. Idem — Statutory provision.- — In suits for money it is the practice of the trial courts to put plaintiff on terms to abate merely excessive amounts found by the jury, but not so in ejectment because of Code, § 2746, prescribing what the verdict for land shall be.</p>

Judges: Faüntleroy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.