Shields's heirs v. Bryant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a] proposal to amend a complaint is futile if the proposed amended complaint would fail to state a claim upon which relief could be granted”
• holding that “[a] proposal to amend a complaint is futile if the proposed amended complaint would fail to state a claim upon which relief could be granted”
• holding that “[a] proposal to amend a complaint is futile if the proposed amended complaint would fail to state a claim upon which relief could be granted” (internal citations omitted)
• holding that “[a] proposal to amend a complaint is futile if the proposed amended complaint would fail to state a claim upon which relief could be granted” (internal citations omitted)
• noting that “compliance with Rule 16 is a threshold matter which may obviate the Rule 15 analysis”
• finding that plaintiff had not shown good cause under Rule 16 for waiting to act on information that was clearly in its possession some 10 months earlier

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).