Shields v. Whitlock
Citations
- 110 La. 714
- 34 So. 747
- 1903 La. LEXIS 698
Syllabus
<p>PRESCRIPTION — TRESPASS ON LAND.</p> <p>1. Where, in an action, governed by the law as it stood prior to the adoption of Act No. 33, p. 41, of 1902, for damages for trespass upon land, including the cutting and removing of timber, it appears that no timber has been cut or removed and no other trespass committed within the year preceding the institution of the suit, the plea of prescription of one year should be sustained.</p> <p>Blanchard, J., dissenting.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding an opt-out provision that requires a mailed written notice to a company’s address within 30 days not to be unconscionable
- “Although arbitrability is a question of federal law, applicable state contract law controls whether the parties have a valid agreement to arbitrate.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blanchard, Monroe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.