Shields v. Sta-Fit, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, although “[m]embership in a health club is certainly beneficial . . . that is a far cry from declaring health clubs an indispensable necessity as a matter of public policy”
• “[The 9 Health Studio Service Act] does not, however, impose safety regulations or require 10 that employees be licensed or even well-trained. Nor does it authorize any 11 administrative agency to regulate the health club industry.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).