Shields v. Shields

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In an indirect criminal contempt proceeding, the movant must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant willfully violated the court order”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Alan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-05-26
• Graves v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-14

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bowen v. Bowen
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-06-20· cited 319×
• Hamilton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-10-10· cited 3×