Skip to main content
· 11/10/1964

Shields v. Hoffman

Citations

  • 416 Pa. 48
  • 204 A.2d 436
  • 1964 Pa. LEXIS 376

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing separate treatment of a contract’s provisions where “the parties apportioned the consideration both as to subject matter and payment”
  • consideration cannot be borrowed from a “separate and distinct” agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.