Shields v. General Electric Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion to compel and noting that, “substantial information dealing with class certification has already been tendered to the defendant”
• finding attorney-client privilege over executed questionnaires that asked for information as to net worth, income, and investment activities
• “Questionnaires sent to individuals for the purpose of assisting an attorney in giving legal advice in the context of imminent litigation are ‘work product.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).