Shields v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that there was no basis to find fraudulent joinder, and even if there were, that the defendant had failed to show a sufficient amount in controversy
• “By its express terms, the Safety Act does not state law obligations and remedies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).