Shields' Administrators v. Chesser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing \a strong presumption in favor of approving a properly-selected lead plaintiff's decision as to counsel\
• disregarding movant’s assertion of an “ostensible partial disclosure” that “was not included in the original Complaint” and thus did not fall within the PLRSA’s 60-day notice requirement
• refusing to consider movant’s assertion of an “ostensible partial disclosure” that “was not included in the original complaint” and that ran afoul of the 60-day deadline for moving for appointment as lead plaintiff
• “Because Jayhawk did not own any shares of ChinaCast stock during or after the initial March 26, 2012 disclosure alleged in the original Complaint . . . Jayhawk suffered no losses attributable to the ChinaCast fraud.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).