Shibuya v. Architects Hawaii, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Plaintiffs had standing to challenge statute of repose because it injured them by depriving them of a cause of action
• no reasonable distinction between members of construction industry and manufacturers; unconstitutional under state equal protection clause but \guided\ by federal decisions
• “[A] court should not substitute its view of wise or fair legislative policy for that of the duly elected representatives of the people.”
• architects and builders statute of repose

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).