Shetterly v. Crown Controls Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court considers conveyor system as substitute for pallet trucks

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Michael SURACE; Alice Surace, H/w, Appellants, v. CATERPILLAR, INC.; CMI Corporation, Appellees
  Third Circuit· 1997-04-22· cited 71×
• Riley v. Warren Manufacturing, Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-01-21· cited 51×
• Nowak v. Faberge Usa Inc.
  Third Circuit· 1994-07-06· cited 16×
• Ballarini v. Clark Equipment Co.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1993-12-14· cited 13×
• Warnick v. NMC-Wollard, Inc.
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-03-08· cited 13×
• Monahan v. Toro Co.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1994-06-30· cited 11×
• Bowersfield v. Suzuki Motor Corp.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2000-08-28· cited 6×
• Wellsboro Hotel Co. v. Prins
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 1995-08-24· cited 5×
• Baker (William, Colleen) v. Crown Controls Corporation
  Third Circuit· 1990-02-23
• Grinarml (Elaine) v. Crown Controls Corporation
  Third Circuit· 1990-02-23
• Holmes (Cheryl B., John) v. Crown Controls Corp
  Third Circuit· 1990-02-23
• Shetterly (Raymond E., Jr., Gayle E.) v. Crown Controls Corporation
  Third Circuit· 1990-02-23