Michigan Supreme Court· 7/7/1887
Sherwood v. Walker
Citations
- 33 N.W. 919
- 66 Mich. 568
- 1887 Mich. LEXIS 525
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the parties’ mistaken belief that a cow was barren “went to the very nature of the thing”
- concluding that the parties' mistaken belief that a cow was barren \went to the very nature of the thing\
- holding that a sale of a supposedly barren cow could be rescinded when it was discovered the cow was actually pregnant
- holding that a sale of a supposedly barren cow could be rescinded when it was discovered the cow was actually pregnant
- holding that a sale of a supposedly barren cow could be rescinded when it was discovered the cow was actually pregnant
- holding that a sale of a supposedly barren cow could be rescinded when it was discovered the cow was actually pregnant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Morse, Sherwood, Campbell, Champlin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Atlas Corp. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 1990-02-02· cited 204×
- Ford Motor Company v. City of WoodhavenMichigan Supreme Court· 2006-06-28· cited 130×
- Briggs Tax Service, LLC v. Detroit Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court· 2010-03-30· cited 115×
- United States v. $277,000 U.S. Currency, and One 1986 Dodge Ram Charger, Jalisco, Mexico, Lic. Hwy 773, and Ramon S. Montes, Claimant-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1995-11-15· cited 91×
- Lenawee County Board of Health v. MesserlyMichigan Supreme Court· 1982-12-23· cited 85×
- Abney v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court· 2007-03-22· cited 73×
- Bituminous Coal Operators' Association, Inc. v. Joseph P. Connors, Sr. Appeal of Associated Electric Cooperatives, IncD.C. Circuit· 1989-02-23· cited 60×
- Aluminum Co. of America v. Essex Group, Inc.W.D. Pennsylvania· 1980-04-07· cited 49×
- Gortney v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Michigan Court of Appeals· 1996-05-10· cited 49×
- In Re Leslie Fay Companies, Inc. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 1996-03-05· cited 48×
- Gartner v. EikillSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-05-21· cited 31×
- Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance v. DufaultSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2008-10-17· cited 29×
- Wilkin v. 1st Source BankIndiana Court of Appeals· 1990-01-11· cited 20×
- Cavanagh v. Tyson, Weare & Marshall Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1917-06-26· cited 19×
- Frazer v. State BankSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1911-11-27· cited 18×
- William T. Gladden Nicole L. Gladden v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueNinth Circuit· 2001-08-20· cited 17×
- Dingeman v. ReffittMichigan Court of Appeals· 1986-06-03· cited 14×
- Creative Communications Consultants, Inc. v. GaylordCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-04-07· cited 13×
- Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co. v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.W.D. Michigan· 1984-03-05· cited 12×
- DiBiase v. Universal Design & Builders, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1984-04-04· cited 12×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.